Social clipping has become one of the fastest-growing social media marketing strategies because it helps long-form content reach much larger audiences. Instead of relying on platform algorithms to promote an entire podcast, livestream, webinar, or interview, brands and creators encourage people to “clip” short, engaging moments and post them across social media platforms. In addition, many creators now pay freelance “clippers” to produce and distribute this content, turning virality into a structured marketing strategy rather than a matter of luck. But what are the legal risks involved with clipping?
Because clipped videos often look like authentic fan content, even when they are part of paid marketing campaigns, they blur the line between independent expression and advertising. So, are existing advertising rules flexible enough to cover social clipping?
Continue Reading Social Clipping and Influencer Marketing: Key Legal Risks
What if the influencer you had been following on Instagram—an influencer whose style choices you admired, and who supported social causes that you believed in—turned out to be…a robot?
There may come a time (but hopefully not) where you need to write a website disclaimer, email, Facebook post, whatever trying to dispel consumer confusion and head off an advertising lawsuit. How might you do that? Keep editing if your first draft looks something like this: “We have learned that some customers are confused and think that we sell ABCompetitor’s Cool Toys. Please take note that we are not related to ABCompetitor.”


James Bond preferred his martinis “shaken, not stirred” but what about Greek yogurt with fruit at the bottom? Well, according to the NAD, stirred or not stirred are both equally acceptable (no word on “shaken”). That was only one of several questions NAD resolved in a challenge by Chobani to a 