As part of a broader campaign to go after “robocall” violations, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has announced a $5,134,500 fine against a company and its owners for making 1,141 robocalls in 2020 that violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The company told recipients of the robocalls that if they voted by mail, their personal information would “be part of a public database that will be used by police departments to track down old warrants and be used by credit card companies to collect outstanding debts.” The case is a strong reminder that political calling campaigns are also subject to the TCPA.

Both the TCPA and the FCC’s rules prohibit prerecorded voice calls to wireless telephone numbers without the recipients’ prior express consent, and this is true regardless of the caller’s intent. These restrictions apply equally to both telemarketing and informational calls, including all non-commercial and political calls. The only exception is for calls that are made for an emergency purpose.

A person or entity that violates these strictures when initiating a telemarketing campaign opens themselves up to significant liability risk, either from an FCC enforcement action or from civil lawsuits, including putative class actions. Marketers should consult with a legal professional before engaging in any calling or texting marketing campaign to make sure the campaign fully comports with all legal and regulatory requirements.

Meanwhile, in another ongoing FCC proceeding on unlawful text messages, a group of 28 state attorneys general weighed in on the issue of whether obtaining single consumer consent could allow for the delivery of calls and text messages from multiple marketers on subjects beyond the scope of the original consent.

These attorneys general urged the FCC to adopt more aggressive rules than it had proposed regarding consent obtained (by lead generators, for example) and limit consent to that “between one specific consumer and one specific seller,” disallowing the use of hyperlinks, marketing partners, or other, broader means of obtaining consent. While the carriers that would need to implement new rules have urged the FCC to be cautious about a change in approach, given the current environment, it certainly is possible that the FCC could take a harder line.

For more insights into advertising law, bookmark our All About Advertising Law blog and subscribe to our monthly newsletter.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Craig A. Gilley

Craig Gilley provides a broad range of services for regulated communications entities, as well as information technology, education technology, investment, and private equity companies. Craig’s primary practice involves counseling cable operators, broadband providers, internet service providers, video programmers, satellite providers, and wireless/wireline telecommunications…

Craig Gilley provides a broad range of services for regulated communications entities, as well as information technology, education technology, investment, and private equity companies. Craig’s primary practice involves counseling cable operators, broadband providers, internet service providers, video programmers, satellite providers, and wireless/wireline telecommunications providers on a broad range of legal, regulatory, operational, and transactional issues. He also regularly provides transactional, operational, compliance, and strategic advice to information and educational technology firms. Craig also represents investment and private equity companies, providing transactional and compliance support to ensure that both their acquisitions and ongoing investments fully comply with regulatory requirements.

Laura Stefani

Laura Stefani works at the intersection of law, policy, and technology, providing clients with a wide range of services in the telecommunications arena. She develops creative regulatory solutions to bring new technologies to market and guides clients on U.S. communications policy initiatives, with…

Laura Stefani works at the intersection of law, policy, and technology, providing clients with a wide range of services in the telecommunications arena. She develops creative regulatory solutions to bring new technologies to market and guides clients on U.S. communications policy initiatives, with a focus on wireless and satellite technologies. She advocates for regulated communications entities regarding licensing, market entry, spectrum use, and other regulatory issues before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and other federal agencies.