On December 20, 2023, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a Petition in state court alleging Sirius XM Radio’s autorenewal practices violated New York’s autorenewal law. In the lawsuit, New York alleges that Sirius XM, an audio entertainment company headquartered in New York, made it difficult for customers to cancel their subscriptions.

New York’s automatic renewal law requires any business that makes an automatic renewal offer or continuous service offer to provide a cost-effective, timely, and easy-to-use mechanism for cancellation. The AG alleges that Sirius violated this requirement by:

  • Requiring customers to call or chat with sales agents who are trained to engage in a lengthy, six-part script designed to convince customers not to cancel
  • Repeatedly asking customers about their listening habits after they requested to cancel so Sirius customer representatives could attempt to “save” the customer using preselected offers
  • Continuously offering additional, cheaper subscription offers to customers trying to cancel who explain that they are seeking to cancel because the cost of their subscription is too high
  • Imposing unreasonable wait times for customers to connect with a live agent to cancel (sometimes over 45 minutes)

The lawsuit also alleges violations of New York’s general deceptive act and practices laws and the federal Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA). The AG is seeking full restitution and damages for all aggrieved customers and disgorgement of all profits related to the alleged deceptive practices.

The lawsuit is yet another example of the expansion in regulatory action against subscription services, which will likely continue into 2024 and beyond. For example, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is set to hold an informal hearing in January regarding its Proposed Negative Option Rule. In addition, other states like California are actively enforcing their automatic renewal laws, and California has a dedicated Auto Renewal Task Force (CART) consisting of district attorneys who enforce the state’s autorenewal law. Waves of class action lawsuits continue to allege violations by negative option, free trial, continuity, and autorenewal practices.

To stay on top of these developments, bookmark our All About Advertising Law blog and subscribe to our monthly newsletter. To learn more about Venable’s Advertising Law services, click here

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Ellen T. Berge Ellen T. Berge

Ellen Berge provides counsel on regulatory compliance, government investigations, contract negotiations, and general business matters. Ellen focuses on advertising, marketing practices, payment processing, and merchant services. Her clients include major brand advertisers and direct-response retailers, and lead generators, telemarketers, media agencies, software providers…

Ellen Berge provides counsel on regulatory compliance, government investigations, contract negotiations, and general business matters. Ellen focuses on advertising, marketing practices, payment processing, and merchant services. Her clients include major brand advertisers and direct-response retailers, and lead generators, telemarketers, media agencies, software providers, and others who serve them. On the merchant services side, she leads a practice that works with banks, processors, sales agents, payment facilitators, independent software vendors, and fintech and financial services businesses. Ellen also serves as the firm’s managing partner of Professional Development and Recruiting.

Photo of Leonard L. Gordon Leonard L. Gordon

Len Gordon, chair of Venable’s Advertising and Marketing Group, is a skilled litigator who leverages his significant experience working for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to help protect his clients’ interests and guide their business activity. Len regularly represents companies and individuals in…

Len Gordon, chair of Venable’s Advertising and Marketing Group, is a skilled litigator who leverages his significant experience working for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to help protect his clients’ interests and guide their business activity. Len regularly represents companies and individuals in investigations and litigation with the FTC, state attorneys general, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Len also represents clients in business-to-business and class action litigation involving both consumer protection and antitrust issues. He also counsels clients on antitrust, advertising, and marketing compliance issues.

Photo of Shahin O. Rothermel Shahin O. Rothermel

Shahin Rothermel is an experienced counselor and defender who helps advertisers, retailers, merchants, and marketers advance their business goals while reducing legal and regulatory risks. Shahin provides clients with up-to-date, practical insights into the constantly evolving advertising, marketing, and e-commerce regulations, which allows…

Shahin Rothermel is an experienced counselor and defender who helps advertisers, retailers, merchants, and marketers advance their business goals while reducing legal and regulatory risks. Shahin provides clients with up-to-date, practical insights into the constantly evolving advertising, marketing, and e-commerce regulations, which allows her clients to make informed decisions. She has achieved successful resolutions, dismissals, and full walkaways in court, saving clients millions of dollars. She takes a pragmatic approach as a counselor, considering the implications of her advice for her clients’ marketing campaigns and their bottom lines.